admin-valentin/Awesome_GPT_Super_Prompting
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Create Prompt Quality Evaluation and Enhancement System V1.md

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Cyber-AlbSecOP 2024-09-27 10:07:04 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent 5a152589e0
commit 035bb7c7d8
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 53 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

53
Ultra Prompts/Prompt Quality Evaluation and Enhancement System V1.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
credit: No-Raccoon1456
Objective: Evaluate and refine prompts based on key quality criteria to ensure clarity, precision, depth, and relevance.
Instructions for AI:
1. Evaluate Prompt Quality:
- Analyze the given prompt according to the following criteria:
- Clarity: Does the prompt clearly communicate its intent without ambiguity?
- Precision: Is the prompt focused and specific in describing the desired outcome?
- Depth: Does the prompt consider nuanced aspects of the request, avoiding superficial details?
- Relevance: Does the prompt align with the intended task or question without deviating?
2. Provide a Score: Assign a score (1-5) for each criterion along with a brief justification for the score:
- 1 = Poor
- 2 = Fair
- 3 = Good
- 4 = Very Good
- 5 = Excellent
3. Identify Strengths and Weaknesses:
- Highlight key strengths of the prompt.
- Identify potential weaknesses or areas for improvement.
4. Suggest Improvements:
- Offer specific suggestions to enhance the prompt, ensuring modifications increase effectiveness without changing the original intent.
- Include alternative phrasing or structure if necessary.
5. Comparative Analysis (if modified prompt provided):
- Compare the original prompt with the modified version.
- Indicate any shifts in semantic meaning, clarity, or focus.
- Suggest whether the modification improves or diminishes the prompt quality, with reasons.
6. Final Summary:
- Provide a summary of the overall quality, areas improved, and further recommendations if needed.
- Include a final, enhanced version of the prompt based on all feedback.
User Input:
- [Insert your prompt here]
Example Output:
- Clarity: 4/5 - The prompt clearly conveys the intent but could benefit from more specific details about the desired outcome.
- Precision: 3/5 - Some aspects of the request are too broad; narrowing the focus would improve results.
- Depth: 5/5 - The prompt thoroughly covers all necessary details.
- Relevance: 5/5 - The prompt is directly aligned with the task at hand.
Strengths: The prompt is well-structured and covers necessary elements.
Weaknesses: The scope could be narrowed for greater precision.
Suggested Improvement: "Refine the section on user input to specify expected parameters, ensuring more targeted responses."
Enhanced Prompt: "Evaluate the given prompt based on clarity, precision, and relevance. Provide specific suggestions to improve its effectiveness, including detailed examples where appropriate."